My previous post included some of the 4RV books coming out in 2011 and some of my personal goals. I promised to give readers a sampling of children's books and books for tweens and teens coming soon.
I always try to keep my promises, so let's begin with those for children:
One of the first to come out in 2011 will be Libby the Odd Squirrel by Lea Schizas and illustrated by Stephen Macquignon.
A New Friend for Dilly, the second in the Dilly series by Rena Jones and illustrated by Lia Oakman, should arrive in bookstores, on Amazon and other online bookstores, and on the 4RV Publishing website not long after the start of the new year.
Another picture book which will be out in 2011 is Carla's Cloud Catastrophe by Beth Bence Reinke and illustrated by Ginger Nielson.
A tween/teen book which just came out the end of 2010 is Dogsled Dreams by Terry Lynn Johnson.
Chapter books on the schedule include Dylan's Tale by Harry Porter and illustrated by Mandy Hedrick and Priscilla Holmes & the Glass Slipper by John Lance and illustrated by Diana Navarro.
The preceding titles are a sample of what people can find at 4RV Publishing. We get many accolades for the quality of the writing and illustrations published by 4RV, as well as the quality of the workmanship of the books themselves.
Another goal I have is to help more excellent books to be available for everyone, readers of all ages.
P.S. Stolen is still available and has been entered into two competitions. I hope to hear from people who read the novel.
Showing posts with label children's books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children's books. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Will we lose a treasure of children's lit?
Overlayered had an interesting post yesterday, about the impact of the "clarification" from the CPSA about the impact of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) on the irreplaceable treasury of children's literture.
(Yes, the CPSIA is still alive and way too well, and only continued pressure will change anything since the House voted to keep the CPSIA as is.)
From Overlawyered: As readers are aware, the Consumer Product Safety Commission yesterday advised thrift stores and other resellers and distributors of used goods to discard (unless they wished to test for lead or take other typically unpractical steps such as contacting manufacturers) children’s books printed before 1985 and a very wide range of other children’s products, including apparel and playthings.
Already, thrift stores, resale stores, and used bookstores are destroying books printed before 1985: books which cannot be replaced because most no longer have needed plates to reprint, and which were out of print before the digital age.
Quoting from Overlawyered again: A “relabel everything as collectible” strategy is, however, of limited legal help to retailers, because the law provides that they are liable if they sell a product which will commonly be understood as destined for use by children, whether or not they label it as such.
So I ask, "Will we lose a treasure of children's literature? Will our children and their children and their children's children be the ones most harmed?"
Only we can change this terribly poorly crafted law -- by continuing to apply pressure on our Senators, Representatives, officials, and the CPSA. If we lessen our efforts, the law will take its toll on our nation in ways that can never be undone.
.
(Yes, the CPSIA is still alive and way too well, and only continued pressure will change anything since the House voted to keep the CPSIA as is.)
From Overlawyered: As readers are aware, the Consumer Product Safety Commission yesterday advised thrift stores and other resellers and distributors of used goods to discard (unless they wished to test for lead or take other typically unpractical steps such as contacting manufacturers) children’s books printed before 1985 and a very wide range of other children’s products, including apparel and playthings.
Already, thrift stores, resale stores, and used bookstores are destroying books printed before 1985: books which cannot be replaced because most no longer have needed plates to reprint, and which were out of print before the digital age.
Quoting from Overlawyered again: A “relabel everything as collectible” strategy is, however, of limited legal help to retailers, because the law provides that they are liable if they sell a product which will commonly be understood as destined for use by children, whether or not they label it as such.
So I ask, "Will we lose a treasure of children's literature? Will our children and their children and their children's children be the ones most harmed?"
Only we can change this terribly poorly crafted law -- by continuing to apply pressure on our Senators, Representatives, officials, and the CPSA. If we lessen our efforts, the law will take its toll on our nation in ways that can never be undone.
.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Burn the house to avoid a cockroach equals CPSIA
Whizbang had an interesting post "Who would want to poison our children?" posted January 19. The entry begins with
A good rule of thumb is that when everyone in Washington agrees on something it's either inane or you better hide your wallet. Of course, there's nothing that will rally together Congress faster than a law written "for the children". So it should come as no surprise that the innocuously named Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) proposed following the lead-paint-in-childrens'-toys-from-China scare last year received almost unanimous support. It passed by a vote of 89-3 in the Senate and 424-1 in the House.
What should also come as no surprise are the unintended consequences CPSIA will have on everyone from toy manufacturers to public libraries.
The post continues with Yet another classic case of razing the house because someone saw a cockroach. The blame here is obviously bi-partisan, and this abomination was signed into law by President Bush. Clearly, no politician (other than Ron Paul) will stand up when they might be shouted down as wanting to poison the children. But either large numbers of Congress-critters supported this law without fully reading and understanding its impact or their intention all along was to saddle makers of kid's goods with an exasperating suite of regulations that will yield no significant improvement on children's health.
Commentary from Forbes, "Scrap the Consumer Product Improvement Act" (by Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the author of The Rule of Lawyers and other books. He edits Overlawyered.com), is quoted in the above post. One section of the commentary by Olson needs to be emphasized:
As CPSIA opponents mobilize, the phrase "unintended consequences" is often heard. Part of the irony, after all, is that the Hasbros and Targets, with their standardization and economies of scale, can afford to adapt to such rules as part of their business plan, while the sorts of enterprises that initially looked to benefit most from the Chinese toy scare--local, organic and so forth--are also the ones who find it hardest to comply.
But the failure here runs deeper. This was not some enactment slipped through in the dead of night: It was one of the most highly publicized pieces of legislation to pass Congress last year.
And yet now it appears precious few lawmakers took the time to check what was in the bill, while precious few in the press (which ran countless let's-pass-a-law articles) cared to raise even the most basic questions about what the law was going to require.
Yes, something's being exposed as systematically defective here. But it's not the contents of our kids' toy chests. It's the way we make public policy.
Hopefully, someone will do something before our house is burned to the ground.
.
A good rule of thumb is that when everyone in Washington agrees on something it's either inane or you better hide your wallet. Of course, there's nothing that will rally together Congress faster than a law written "for the children". So it should come as no surprise that the innocuously named Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) proposed following the lead-paint-in-childrens'-toys-from-China scare last year received almost unanimous support. It passed by a vote of 89-3 in the Senate and 424-1 in the House.
What should also come as no surprise are the unintended consequences CPSIA will have on everyone from toy manufacturers to public libraries.
The post continues with Yet another classic case of razing the house because someone saw a cockroach. The blame here is obviously bi-partisan, and this abomination was signed into law by President Bush. Clearly, no politician (other than Ron Paul) will stand up when they might be shouted down as wanting to poison the children. But either large numbers of Congress-critters supported this law without fully reading and understanding its impact or their intention all along was to saddle makers of kid's goods with an exasperating suite of regulations that will yield no significant improvement on children's health.
Commentary from Forbes, "Scrap the Consumer Product Improvement Act" (by Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the author of The Rule of Lawyers and other books. He edits Overlawyered.com), is quoted in the above post. One section of the commentary by Olson needs to be emphasized:
As CPSIA opponents mobilize, the phrase "unintended consequences" is often heard. Part of the irony, after all, is that the Hasbros and Targets, with their standardization and economies of scale, can afford to adapt to such rules as part of their business plan, while the sorts of enterprises that initially looked to benefit most from the Chinese toy scare--local, organic and so forth--are also the ones who find it hardest to comply.
But the failure here runs deeper. This was not some enactment slipped through in the dead of night: It was one of the most highly publicized pieces of legislation to pass Congress last year.
And yet now it appears precious few lawmakers took the time to check what was in the bill, while precious few in the press (which ran countless let's-pass-a-law articles) cared to raise even the most basic questions about what the law was going to require.
Yes, something's being exposed as systematically defective here. But it's not the contents of our kids' toy chests. It's the way we make public policy.
Hopefully, someone will do something before our house is burned to the ground.
.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Big Trouble on the Publishing Front
Ever hear of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008? If not, you need to read it and understand that, as of next month, the world of publishing, especially children's books will change. It also means that anything in your home that children touch can be illegal.
Here is what Amazon.com sent 4RV Publishing:
The U.S. House and Senate have passed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (the 'Act'), and on August 14, 2008, President Bush signed the Act into law.
We expect that all Amazon.com vendors will ensure that their products are compliant with the Act in accordance with all applicable effective dates. Specific provisions of the Act discussed in this letter are for ease of reference only. Specific provisions of the Act discussed in this letter are for ease of reference only. Further information on the Act is available on the Consumer Product Safety Commission ('CPSC') website at www.cpsc.gov.
********************************
Product Content Limits
********************************
The Act prescribes strict limits on the content of certain materials in products intended for children, including lead and phthalates. In particular:
* Effective February 10, 2009, the Act prohibits the sale of children's toys and child care articles with concentrations of more than 0.1 percent of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), diisodecyl phthalate, (DIDP), or di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP).
* The Act mandates a phased-in ban on lead in substrate for all children's products, requiring that lead levels be reduced to a maximum of 600 parts per million by February 10, 2009; 300 parts per million by August 14, 2009; and 100 parts per million by August 14, 2011. Electronic devices and inaccessible component parts will be subject to rules to be issued by August 14, 2009.
* The Act also reduces permissible lead in paint content from 0.06 percent to 0.009 percent (effective August 14, 2009), which may be lowered further by administrative action.
********************************
What you need to do
********************************
We expect that vendors will familiarize themselves with the effective dates of each applicable limit. In order to minimize the difficulty of tracking multiple versions of the same product through the supply chain, it is highly advisable for manufacturers to promptly eliminate or phase-out product offerings which do not or will not comply with the most restrictive limits described above, well before such limits take effect.
Follow the instructions located in this file, download and complete the spreadsheet and return it to us as an attachment to a Contact Us form, using Issue: Item Detail Page; Subissue: Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act.
If all of your products are compliant with the lead and phthalate limits according to the table below, submit a Contact Us, using the instructions above, with the following statement 'We, [Vendor Name], certify that all of our products are compliant with the lead and phthalate limits effective as of August 14, 2011 as defined by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.'
If some of your products are not compliant by any of the dates below, you must complete the spreadsheet located in the Resource Center of Vendor Central, as stated above. Only one spreadsheet needs to be completed.
As of each date set forth in Column III of the table below, each vendor must confirm and report to Amazon.com that all of your children's products (i) in Amazon.com's inventory, as reported to you in Vendor Central as of such date, and (ii) in transit or shipped to Amazon.com on or after such date, will comply with applicable limits set forth in Column I.
********************************
Specific Guidelines:
********************************
Limit Phthalate ban:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 10-Feb-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 30-Nov-08; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 15-Jan-09
Lead 600 ppm:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 10-Feb-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 30-Nov-08; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 15-Jan-09
Limit Lead 300 ppm:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 14-Aug-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 14-Apr-09; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 1-Jul-09
Limit Lead paint 0.009:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 14-Aug-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 14-Apr-09; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 1-Jul-09
Limit Lead 100 ppm:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 14-Aug-11; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 14-Feb-11; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 1-Jul-11
Please put your vendor name in the subject field of the email when you respond in any case.
Any children's products which are not so confirmed are subject to removal from the Amazon.com catalog, and Amazon.com will be entitled to return to you for a full refund (including shipping costs) any non-compliant products which remain in our inventory as of the dates in Column IV above.
In order to minimize difficulties in inventory compliance tracking, any products which are altered to comply with a limit described in the Act must have a distinct SKU number from previous versions. These changes must be reported to Amazon.com along with a return authorization for any Amazon.com inventory of previous versions.
The Act provides that the CPSC may issue regulations providing for further limitations on the content of children's products. Vendors are responsible for tracking and complying with any regulations issued by the CPSC.
We are confident that you share our commitment to ensure the full compliance with the Act of all of your products sold on Amazon.com.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Best Regards,
Amazon.com
Next post: What does this mean to small publishers and others (even authors) who sell children's books?
.
Here is what Amazon.com sent 4RV Publishing:
The U.S. House and Senate have passed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (the 'Act'), and on August 14, 2008, President Bush signed the Act into law.
We expect that all Amazon.com vendors will ensure that their products are compliant with the Act in accordance with all applicable effective dates. Specific provisions of the Act discussed in this letter are for ease of reference only. Specific provisions of the Act discussed in this letter are for ease of reference only. Further information on the Act is available on the Consumer Product Safety Commission ('CPSC') website at www.cpsc.gov.
********************************
Product Content Limits
********************************
The Act prescribes strict limits on the content of certain materials in products intended for children, including lead and phthalates. In particular:
* Effective February 10, 2009, the Act prohibits the sale of children's toys and child care articles with concentrations of more than 0.1 percent of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), diisodecyl phthalate, (DIDP), or di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP).
* The Act mandates a phased-in ban on lead in substrate for all children's products, requiring that lead levels be reduced to a maximum of 600 parts per million by February 10, 2009; 300 parts per million by August 14, 2009; and 100 parts per million by August 14, 2011. Electronic devices and inaccessible component parts will be subject to rules to be issued by August 14, 2009.
* The Act also reduces permissible lead in paint content from 0.06 percent to 0.009 percent (effective August 14, 2009), which may be lowered further by administrative action.
********************************
What you need to do
********************************
We expect that vendors will familiarize themselves with the effective dates of each applicable limit. In order to minimize the difficulty of tracking multiple versions of the same product through the supply chain, it is highly advisable for manufacturers to promptly eliminate or phase-out product offerings which do not or will not comply with the most restrictive limits described above, well before such limits take effect.
Follow the instructions located in this file, download and complete the spreadsheet and return it to us as an attachment to a Contact Us form, using Issue: Item Detail Page; Subissue: Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act.
If all of your products are compliant with the lead and phthalate limits according to the table below, submit a Contact Us, using the instructions above, with the following statement 'We, [Vendor Name], certify that all of our products are compliant with the lead and phthalate limits effective as of August 14, 2011 as defined by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.'
If some of your products are not compliant by any of the dates below, you must complete the spreadsheet located in the Resource Center of Vendor Central, as stated above. Only one spreadsheet needs to be completed.
As of each date set forth in Column III of the table below, each vendor must confirm and report to Amazon.com that all of your children's products (i) in Amazon.com's inventory, as reported to you in Vendor Central as of such date, and (ii) in transit or shipped to Amazon.com on or after such date, will comply with applicable limits set forth in Column I.
********************************
Specific Guidelines:
********************************
Limit Phthalate ban:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 10-Feb-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 30-Nov-08; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 15-Jan-09
Lead 600 ppm:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 10-Feb-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 30-Nov-08; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 15-Jan-09
Limit Lead 300 ppm:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 14-Aug-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 14-Apr-09; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 1-Jul-09
Limit Lead paint 0.009:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 14-Aug-09; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 14-Apr-09; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 1-Jul-09
Limit Lead 100 ppm:
Effective Date of Limit per the Act 14-Aug-11; Products shipped to Amazon.com must comply by 14-Feb-11; Noncompliant products are subject to return to Vendor 1-Jul-11
Please put your vendor name in the subject field of the email when you respond in any case.
Any children's products which are not so confirmed are subject to removal from the Amazon.com catalog, and Amazon.com will be entitled to return to you for a full refund (including shipping costs) any non-compliant products which remain in our inventory as of the dates in Column IV above.
In order to minimize difficulties in inventory compliance tracking, any products which are altered to comply with a limit described in the Act must have a distinct SKU number from previous versions. These changes must be reported to Amazon.com along with a return authorization for any Amazon.com inventory of previous versions.
The Act provides that the CPSC may issue regulations providing for further limitations on the content of children's products. Vendors are responsible for tracking and complying with any regulations issued by the CPSC.
We are confident that you share our commitment to ensure the full compliance with the Act of all of your products sold on Amazon.com.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Best Regards,
Amazon.com
Next post: What does this mean to small publishers and others (even authors) who sell children's books?
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)